Sock's Rheumatoid Arthritis Links - RA

Case IV RA
Home | Disease Process - RA | Summary - RA | EAF's - RA | Tests | My Personal Experience | Updates I | Drugs | Cytokines I | Strategies - RA | Therapy | Updates II - RA | Rheumatic -Arthritis - Lyme | Osteoporosis I | Inflammatory Arthritis | Research - RA | Inflammation | Biology | T-B Cells | Cytokines II | Immune System | Case I RA | Treatment | Musculoskeletal - Arthritis - OA - RA - FM | Management RA | Osteoporosis II | Case III RA | Case IV RA | Case V RA

bridgeinforest.jpg

During her initial visit, a well-nourished, 41-year-old  woman presented to her primary care physician (PCP) complaining of general malaise, fatigue, joint pain, and morning joint stiffness. These symptoms began approximately 10 weeks prior to her visit. Her joint pain became progressively worse during the week before she sought medical attention.
 
She reported no major health problems before this visit. During the week before her visit to the PCP, the patient self-medicated with an over-the-counter (OTC) preparation arthritis formula that contained acetaminophen. This OTC product produced partial relief of her joint pain, but it did not alter her sense of fatigue or her feeling of general malaise.
 
The patient denied any recent travel outside her suburban northeastern community, exposure to insect bites, or previous treatment for infectious diseases. She did mention, however, that one of her three young children had a cold, which was manifested by a low-grade fever and rhinorrhea about 2 weeks previous to the onset of her own symptoms. The only medication the patient was taking in addition to the acetaminophen was a daily birth control pill.
 
The patient's lungs were clear by both auscultation and palpation. Her heart sounds were normal. She had no cervical or axial lymphadenopathy. Funduscopy and otoscopy were both unremarkable.
 
Swelling and tenderness were noted in both wrists, with exaggerated tenderness in metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints 2 and 5 bilaterally. The proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints 3 and 4 of the left hand and 2 of the right hand were also swollen. On a scale of 0 to 10, the patient reported her pain as being a 5.
 
Pain was also elicited by range-of-motion testing of the right knee and both ankles, although there was no swelling in any of these joints.
 
Hematology: Blood was drawn for a complete blood count (CBC). The results of her CBC were as follows: Hemoglobin: 10.1 g/dL (Normal range: 12 to 16 g/dL for women) ;Hematocrit: 31% (Normal range: 35% to 47% for women) ;WBC: 7,300/mm3 (Normal range: 3,600 to 11,000/mm3) ;Platelets: 459,000/mm3 (Normal range: 150,000 to 400,000/mm3) ;Leukocyte differential count: Within normal limits
 
Blood Chemistries: Electrolytes, renal function and liver function tests were near the lower limits of normal: AST: 15.3 (Normal range: 15 to 37 U/L)
ALT: 30.2 (Normal range: 30 to 65 U/L) ;Total bilirubin: 0.3 (Normal range: 0 to 1 mg/dL)
 
Imaging Studies: A routine chest x-ray (CXR) was performed. It was unremarkable and all lung fields were clear.
 
Initial Diagnosis: A presumptive diagnosis of probable early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was based on her physical examination. Laboratory studies were within normal limits.
 
Initial Treatment: The patient was instructed to rest for a few days and was prescribed ibuprofen 600 mg. She was requested to return for a follow-up visit in 4 weeks with a plan to refer her to a rheumatologist if her symptoms persisted.
 
At this point which of the following tests would a physician have ordered? Tests ordered by the attending PCP are indicated later. (physicians comment follows each test;in this case history)
 
Urinalysis: The importance of urinalysis as a routine diagnostic tool has declined. However, it remains an important test in the diagnosis of liver abnormalities, urinary tract disease, or metabolic diseases such as diabetes.
Somewhat useful
 
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR): The ESR is a nonspecific acute-phase biomarker. An elevated ESR (normal range: 0-20 mm/hr) is a broad indicator of inflammation, and elevated values are often found in patients with systemic inflammatory diseases, such as inflammatory arthritis. However, the ESR is often elevated in infectious processes and in certain malignancies. The ESR may take many days to return to within a normal range, even after the infectious agent or inflammatory process has been cleared from the body. A normal value does not exclude inflammatory arthropathy. Very useful
 
C-reactive protein (CRP): The CRP is also a non-specific indicator of the acute phase response. Elevated levels of CRP indicate an inflammatory state and can be associated with an infectious disease, rheumatic condition, or other process that produces inflammation. Although the ESR and CRP are both nonspecific in their response to an acute inflammatory reaction within the body, the levels of CRP rise and fall more quickly and reveal a wider dynamic range than the ESR. Very useful
 
Rheumatoid factor (RF): RF titers may be elevated in rheumatoid arthritis. Eventually 80% to 85% of patients with RA will have a positive test for RF. However, early in the disease course, 50% or less may have it. By definition, 5% of normal persons will have a positive test for RF, and for some populations, such as elderly women, the prevalence among normals may be as high as 15% to 20%. Higher titers or concentrations of RF are more specific for the diagnosis of RA than are lower values, although high levels may also be seen in patients with Sjögren's syndrome, cryroglobulinemia, hepatitis, and some other arthridites. High titers of RF are associated with a poor prognosis in patients with RA. Useful
 
Antinuclear antibody (ANA) titer: ANA titers may be elevated in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other inflammatory conditions often associated with polyarthropathy. These conditions include RA and systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). ANA titers may be normal in healthy relatives of patients with SLE. Somewhat useful
 
Radiographs of affected joints: Radiographic changes may occur early in the course of RA, but in early RA, the only changes observed may be soft tissue swelling, as may be noticed during a physical examination. Subsequent x-rays may show periarticular osteoporosis, joint space narrowing (indicating damage to articular cartilage), and marginal bony erosions. In some cases, erosions indicating bony damage may be evident within the first year. The presence of erosions is important as it is associated with a poorer outcome. Useful
 
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): An MRI may demonstrate joint changes specific to RA. The superior soft tissue discrimination of the MRI is useful in evaluating patients in both the early and advanced stages of RA. Conventional radiography has been a cornerstone of evaluation and follow-up of arthridites that involve the hand and wrist. The MRI achieves noninvasive and accurate delineation of hyaline articular cartilage, ligaments, tendons, and synovium as distinct from cortical bone. MRI can be used to measure RA abnormalities, including erosions, articular cartilage thickness, synovial membrane volume, and pannus. The widespread utilization of MRI has been limited by cost constraints, availability of the devices, and the time required to image. Useful
 
Ultrasound evaluation: In patients with RA, ultrasonography can detect signs of bone resorption before it is detectable using conventional radiography. Sonography is superior to other imaging modalities in diagnosing fluid accumulations and should be first-line for the diagnosis of joint effusions and synovial cysts. In proliferative diseases of the synovium such as RA, high-frequency ultrasound can depict the hypoechoic, thickened synovium, especially when it is outlined by an effusion. Useful
 
At the time of her follow-up visit, the patient reported that she felt worse and that more joints were hurting. She had been taking 650 mg of acetaminophen tid along with her prescribed 600 mg of ibuprofen tid. She reported that she could not take the prescribed ibuprofen more than three times daily due to dyspepsia.
 
During this visit, the patient reported her pain as being 7 on a scale of 0 to 10. On her previous visit, she reported her pain as being a 5. When asked about her morning stiffness, she reported that she experienced stiffness for about 2 hours after awakening and that some of her joints, including her hands, felt stiff all day to the extent that she had difficulty opening jars or even putting on her clothing.
 
Physical examination during the follow-up visit established tenderness and swelling of both wrists and the right elbow. Her MCP joints 2, 3, and 5 were swollen bilaterally. During her initial visit only the MCP joints 2 and 5 were affected. The patient's PIP joints 2, 3, and 4 of the left hand and 2, 3, and 5 of the right hand were swollen. During the patient's initial visit, only PIP joints 3 and 4 of the left hand were affected as well as 2 of the right hand.
 
In addition, it was also evident that there was swelling in the right acromioclavicular joint, both knees, and left ankle. Her metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints were diffusely tender and painful on movement, as were both shoulders, although it was not clear whether there was swelling of these joints.
 
It was apparent that her condition had worsened during the 4 weeks following her initial visit. The PCP ordered the patient to stop taking both ibuprofen and acetaminophen and switched her medication to diclofenac (Voltaren®) 75 mg bid. A referral to a rheumatologist in 3 weeks time was made for the patient.
Radiographs of her feet demonstrated 3 periarticular erosions about the distal metatarsal heads at 3 months.
 
Her PCP continued to consider that the initial presumptive diagnosis of RA was the strongest probability in this case. Although the patient had relatively short history of illness, the presence of symmetric polyarthropathy accompanied by swelling and tenderness in more than three joints, including MCP and MTP joints, reinforced the diagnosis of RA. Additional evidence to suggest a diagnosis of RA included persistent fatigue, generalized malaise, and prolonged morning joint stiffness.
 
The primary attending physician did not order the following tests to be performed: CBC, uric acid, hepatitis panel, borreliosis titer, parvovirus B19 IgM titer, ASO titer, ANA titer, ACE level, HLA typing, another CXR, MRI, or joint sonograms.
 
A CBC was performed during the patient's initial visit to her attending physician. At that time, and on the basis of a thorough medical history and physical examination, her PCP thought the following conditions unlikely: gout, acute hepatitis, Lyme disease, parvovirus infection, rheumatic fever, SLE, sarcoidosis, ankylosing spondylitis, and reactive arthritis (Reiter's syndrome). Specific tests to reinforce this differential diagnosis were not performed. An ESR was performed at the time of the follow-up visit.
 
What is the most likely diagnosis? What other conditions should be considered in the differential diagnosis?
 
Pseudogout: The principal differential diagnosis for pseudogout is the presence of sepsis or gout (both of which may coexist with calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition). Gram stain and culture of the synovial fluid should be undertaken even when calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (or monosodium urate monohydrate) crystals are identified. Pseudogout affects only or a few joints in mostly elderly patients. Somewhat likely
 
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA): This diagnosis should be considered in patients with both psoriasis and symptoms of arthritis. Psoriatic lesions can often be small and hidden in the scalp, umbilicus, and gluteal folds. PsA is difficult to distinguish from reactive arthritis (Reiter's syndrome), since both manifest dactylitis. Psoriasis is associated with swelling of DIP and PIP joints. PsA differs from RA by its general lack of rheumatoid factor, tendency to asymmetry, presence of dactylitis, iritis, the axial skeletal involvement, and characteristic radiologic features. Somewhat likely
 
Reactive arthritis: Also known as Reiter's syndrome, this reactive polyarthritis develops several weeks after 1% of cases of nongonococcal urethritis and 2% of enteric infections, particularly those caused by Yersinia enterocolitica, Shigella flexneri, Campylobacter jejuni, and Salmonella species. Diagnosis is made by needle aspiration of the joint.  Likely
 
Viral arthritis: Viruses may produce arthritis by infecting synovial fluid during a systemic invasion or by provoking an immunologic reaction involving the joints. 50% of women report persistent arthralgias and 10% frank arthritis within 3 days of the rash accompanying natural infection with rubella virus and within 2 to 6 weeks after receiving live virus vaccine. In a few cases, symmetric inflammation of the fingers, wrists, and knees recurs for longer than a year. A syndrome of chronic fatigue, low-grade fever, headaches, and myalgias can persist for months and even years. Approximately 60% of women develop arthritis after infection with parvovirus B19. Serologic testing can rule this out. Likely
 
Lyme disease: Tick-borne infection by the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi causes arthritis in up to 70% of persons who are not treated. Serologic testing for IgG antibodies to B. burgdorferi are positive in >90% of persons with Lyme arthritis. A PCR-based assay also detects Borrelia DNA in 85% of all cases. Unlikely
 
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA): A typical picture of RA is bilateral symmetric inflammatory polyarthritis involving large and small joints in both upper and lower extremities, with the sparing of the axial skeleton except the cervical spine. Constitutional features that indicate the inflammatory nature of RA such as morning stiffness support the diagnosis. Additional help in establishing a diagnosis is the presence of the rheumatoid factor, inflammatory synovial fluid with increased numbers of neutrophils, plus radiologic findings of juxta-articular bone demineralization and erosions of the affected joints. Very likely
 
In the rheumatologist's office, the patient reported that she was perhaps 20% better overall since her switch to diclofenac, but that she was still distressed by her continuing symptoms.
 
Additional laboratory studies were ordered at this time, with the following results: ESR: 68 mm/hr (Normal range 0 to 20 mm/hr) ;ALT: 65 U/L (Normal range: 30 to 65 U/L) ;AST: 49 U/L (Normal range: 15 to 37 U/L) ;Alkaline phosphatase: 65 U/L (Normal range: 20 to 140 U/L) ;Total bilirubin: 0.9 mg/dL (Normal range: 0 to 1.0 mg/dL) ;Albumin: 3.5 g/dL (Normal range: 3.4 to 5.0 g/dL)
 
Her prolonged ESR demonstrated the presence of an inflammatory process. Elevations slightly above the higher limit of normal in both AST and ALT and total bilirubin suggested minor liver abnormalities. Other assays in her Chem-20 panel were unremarkable.
 
What are the most likely causes of abnormal liver function tests? What are other potential causes of abnormal liver function tests? What are the reasons for considering a diagnosis being likely
 
Drug-induced (acetaminophen): Hepatic toxicity may occur following ingestion of over 7.5 g to 10 g acetaminophen over a period of 8 hours. Symptoms of overdose include nausea, vomiting, diaphoresis, and general malaise.  Dr's opinion: Somewhat likely
 
Elevations of ALT or bilirubin may occur during therapy. Borderline elevations (<3x ULN) or elevated ALTs occur in 15% of patients. Dr's opinion: Very likely
 
About 1% to 2% of women taking oral contraceptives develop steroid-type cholestasis, which may also be caused by methyltestosterone and related drugs. Onset is usually gradual, and systemic symptoms are generally absent. There is little or no hepatocellular inflammation. Alkaline phosphatase is elevated, but aminotransferase levels are usually unremarkable, and liver biopsy shows only centrizonal bile stasis with little portal reaction or hepatocellular disarray. Complete resolution follows drug withdrawal. Unlikely
 
Alcoholic hepatitis: Alcoholic hepatitis develops in about 15% to 20% of chronic alcoholics and is the most common precursor to cirrhosis. Liver biopsy is the most certain approach to definitive diagnosis. In this case, the patient drank little alcohol. Unlikely
 
The rheumatologist's diagnosis was early aggressive RA. His initial diagnosis concurred with that of the PCP's because of the patient's overall clinical picture of symmetrical joint swelling and pain, erosive processes in the feet as demonstrated via radiography, and her elevated ESR.
 
The rheumatologist attributed the liver enzyme abnormalities to the diclofenac, which he discontinued. Because of her slightly elevated ALT, AST, and total bilirubin levels, the rheumatologist suggested that he could not begin a number of potential therapies for her arthritis until her liver function tests returned to within the normal range. In order to provide immediate relief of the pain and swelling, the rheumatologist placed the patient on a regimen of oral prednisone (10 mg/d for 1 week, then 7.5 mg/d). The patient was scheduled for a follow-up visit to the rheumatologist in 4 weeks.
 
Which of the following treatment options are indicated at this time? Begin prophylaxis for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP)  
   
Even though the patient was not taking glucocorticoid medication for an overly prolonged period of time, consideration should be given to prophylaxis for GIOP. She is still actively menstruating, so appropriate Rx would be calcium plus vitamin D.--Most indicated
 
Add a COX-2 inhibitor: The choice of a different NSAID or a COX-2 inhibitor would not be unreasonable, but still might be associated with increased LFTs. The safety benefit of the COX-2 agents, deceased bleeding and in particular decreased GI bleeding, is of lesser relevance in this case. --Not indicated
 
Add methotrexate (MTX): MTX, an immunosuppressive drug, can suppress inflammation and may allow reduction of corticosteroid doses. In the course of severe active disease, MTX may be used reasonably early, and benefit is often evident within 3 to 4 weeks. However, major side effects can occur, including liver disease, pneumonitis, and bone marrow suppression. In this case, addition of MTX may be a good idea but should not be undertaken until LFT abnormalities resolve. Liver function must be monitored in all patients taking MTX. --Somewhat indicated
 
Add a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist: This is a possibility; most practitioners would try a DMARD first, but data from ERA show (Bathon JM et al. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1586-1593) some benefit to early use of TNF antagonists. The only trial to date comparing biologic DMARDs against an active comparator, the ERA trial was an early disease trial but not an initial therapy trial; 45% of patients had already received DMARDs, although not MTX. -- Minimally indicated
 
Add hydroxychloroquine (HCQ): A reasonable but weak choice, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an immunosuppressive agent used in the treatment of RA. However, it does not possess either anti-inflammatory or analgesic properties. Studies have shown that 60% to 80% of RA patients note some benefit with HCQ, whereas 20% to 30% remain unchanged or worse, and about 8% stop treatment because of side effects. About 50% of those who do respond do so within 2 months, whereas 88% respond within 6 months. --Somewhat indicated
 
Eventually taper off prednisone (5 mg/d): Because of her young age and the deleterious effects of long-term steroid use, she should eventually be tapered off the prednisone therapy. This reduction in dosage should take place slowly, over the course of 2 to 6 months.-- Indicated
 
Third Visit to the Rheumatologist: The patient asked if her steroid medication could be reduced, since she had gained 5 pounds over the course of 4 weeks and was feeling irritable. A schedule was worked out whereby it was decided that she would reduce her dose of prednisone by increments of 1 mg/day at monthly intervals.
 
Additional Follow-up Visits to the Rheumatologist: The patient was seen during additional follow-up visits at approximately 6-week intervals. She continued to do well on steroid therapy, except she noticed that fatigue and arthralgia developed when she decreased her prednisone dose below 3 mg/day. It was decided to maintain this dosing level.
 
Laboratory studies demonstrated that her ALT levels had returned to normal.
About 5 months after her initial visit to the rheumatologist, the patient demonstrated marked disease progression manifested by the increased number and severity of swollen, tender, and painful joints, progressive physical disability, and fatigue.
 
Her ESR had risen once again to 72 mm/hour. Radiographic evaluation of her feet and hands revealed additional small areas of erosion in the bones of her feet and greater swelling in her hand and wrist joints.
 
Which of the following treatment options are indicated at this time?
 
Increase the dose of prednisone back to 10 mg/d: An increase in her prednisone dose might be useful in alleviating her pain and swelling. However, toxicities associated with prolonged steroid use, including osteoporosis, should be kept in mind. --Most indicated
 
Add a NSAID or COX-2 inhibitor: NSAIDs provide important symptomatic relief and may be adequate as simple therapy for mild RA, but they do not appear to alter the long-term course of the disease. Using drugs that may inhibit only or predominantly COX-2 (eg, celecoxib, rofecoxib) may avoid many of the side effects that result from drugs that also inhibit COX-1. -- Minimally indicated
 
Add MTX: This anti-inflammatory drug has been shown to help patients with RA. She might be started on a low dose of MTX and closely monitored for side effects. --Most indicated
 
Add HCQ: This agent can be effective for controlling the symptoms of mild or moderately active RA. Although toxic effects are usually mild, irreversible retinal degeneration has been reported. For this reason, ophthalmologic testing of visual fields using a red test object is recommended before and every 6 months during treatment. The drug can be continued as a long as it is effective, but should be discontinued if no improvement is shown after 6 to 9 months.  Somewhat indicated
 
The physician was not sold on biologic therapy. His thoughts: Further studies are needed to assess the value of the TNF antagonists in the treatment of RA. The  referrel rheumatologist did not completely agree (case by case-suitability).
 
Actual-reality: The patient refused increased doses of prednisone, so MTX was added, and then a TNF antagonist when the patient had a suboptimal response to aggressive MTX dosing.
 
This case emphasizes the need to individualize diagnosis and treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, particularly in early stages when appropriate treatment may halt progression of disease.

Rheumatoid Arthritis Case History:
 
A 56-year-old woman visited her physician reporting painful, swollen joints in the hands and knees of 9 months' duration. Because of her pain and fatigue, she had hardly been able to garden this summer. She had tried acetaminophen (750 mg) 4 times per day without significant benefit. She had to cut off a ring recently because it no longer fit over her finger. She reported that she stays "stiff and stove-up" for 3 hours after she gets up and can barely do housework. She feels tired, despite daily naps.
 
Physical examination showed bony enlargement of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints of both hands. There was symmetric bilateral swelling with effusions of the PIP and MCP joints. She could make a tight fist, but her grip strength was limited because of pain. The MCP joints seemed loose, suggesting mild collateral ligament laxity.
 
There was also mild to moderate swelling, tenderness, and warmth of both wrists. The knees were slightly warm and had small effusions; the MTP joints were tender, particularly at the metatarsal heads along the plantar surface of the feet. Other joints were normal.
 
This woman has findings typical of early, but quite active, RA. Baseline evaluation should be performed, and the patient should be considered for antirheumatic treatment. She also has Heberden's nodes, indications of osteoarthritis of the DIP joints, which is a common feature in older women but not an explanation for most of her symptoms.
 
CBC showed mild anemia, with hemoglobin of 11.1 gm/dL and hematocrit of 32%. WBC and platelet counts were normal. RF was positive at 1:1,280 (latex agglutination), a high titer. Liver function tests and hepatitis virus screens were normal. ESR was 73 mm/hour. Hand and wrist films revealed periarticular osteopenia at the MCP and PIP joints. There was a suggestion of joint space narrowing throughout the wrist.
 
The clinical and laboratory data indicate this patient has RA and a high probability for developing progressive, erosive disease. The x-rays do not indicate definite erosive disease, but erosions may take months to years to develop. The positive RF helps confirm the clinical impression of RA and a prognosis for severe disease.
 
After normal renal function was confirmed, the patient was started on oral methotrexate 7.5 mg/week and quickly advanced to 15 mg/week. After the first month, she noticed a substantial improvement in her joint symptoms. By 6 months, the ESR had fallen to 32 mm/hour and the hemoglobin had increased to 12.2 gm/dL, even though the red cell mean corpuscular volume (MCV) had risen to the abnormal range.
 
Although methotrexate may cause marrow damage, its anti-inflammatory effect may improve the anemia of chronic disease in patients who respond well to treatment. The increase in the MCV is common, but should nonetheless alert the physician to the possibility of methotrexate toxicity. The patient should be placed on folic acid 1 mg/day. Several studies have demonstrated that such supplementation can minimize the side effects of methotrexate without loss of benefit. Some physicians would initiate treatment with antimalarial agents, either with or instead of methotrexate. The decreased ESR was probably caused by a fall in acute-phase proteins and by partial correction of the anemia. CRP, which is independent of anemia, is a more reliable measure of inflammation.
 
The patient continued to have periodic CBCs and liver function tests. Results were normal. Her ESR continued to fall, and the joint swelling decreased. At a subsequent visit, however, she reported new bumps over her elbows.
 
Palpation revealed several firm nodules in both olecranon bursae and at the extensor surface of the proximal ulna. She had no splinter hemorrhages, periungual or digital infarcts, or other evidence of vasculitis.
 
This patient had developed rheumatoid nodules, a complication of seropositive RA. What is unusual is that these nodules developed while the RA was improving and seemingly well controlled. Because both the clinical examinations and laboratory tests indicated that the inflammation was improving, another explanation for the nodules must be sought.
 
The nodulosis may be caused by methotrexate. Patients with methotrexate-induced nodules develop rapidly progressing nodulosis that improves when methotrexate is withdrawn. Unless the nodules become a problem to the patient, the methotrexate can be continued. Preliminary studies have indicated that oral colchicine may improve the nodulosis.
 
Laboratory Tests in Context: I) The presence of rheumatoid factor (RF) contributed to the diagnostic certainty of rheumatoid arthritis.
 
II) RF helped determine prognosis and therefore influenced therapeutic decisions.
 
III) The erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein helped assess disease activity.
 
IV) Development of nodules at a time when laboratory and clinical signs of inflammation were improving alerted the physician to consider methotrexate-induced nodulosis.